Oxygenation Index (OI)
- CategoryRespiratory
- Versionv1.1.0
- Reviewed2026-08-03
- ValidationIndependent clinical validation: pending
OI = (MAP × FiO₂ × 100) ÷ PaO₂, where MAP is mean airway pressure in cmH₂O, FiO₂ is the inspired-oxygen FRACTION (0.21–1.0), and PaO₂ is arterial oxygen tension in mmHg; the result is a unitless index displayed to one decimal. The FiO₂ unit is load-bearing, not a detail: PALICC-2 (2023) prints this index as MAP(cmH₂O) × FiO₂(percent) ÷ PaO₂(mmHg), and the explicit ×100 above is precisely what converts a fraction into that percentage form, so the two renderings are the same number (the ×100 form is written out in Slaughter 2025). Applying both conventions, or neither, is a 100-fold error in opposite directions; a worked example in the test suite pins the magnitude so the factor cannot be simplified away. Bands are matched against the raw unrounded value using the PALICC-2 (2023) two-tier scheme: OI < 4 is below the invasive-ventilation oxygenation criterion, 4 ≤ OI < 16 is mild–moderate, and OI ≥ 16 is severe.
OI is the mean airway pressure times FiO₂ times 100, divided by the arterial oxygen tension (PaO₂) — higher OI means a worse oxygenation defect. It requires an arterial line (for the PaO₂) and is defined only on positive-pressure ventilation, where a mean airway pressure exists (conventional IMV or HFOV); it is undefined for spontaneous breathing, nasal cannula, or standard non-invasive masks. FiO₂ is entered as a fraction here and the ×100 converts it to the percentage form the guideline prints: PALICC-2 (2023) states OI as MAP(cmH₂O) × FiO₂(percent) ÷ PaO₂(mmHg), which is the identical number. This is the single most likely implementation error in the score — apply both conventions and the index is 100× too large, apply neither and it is 100× too small — so if a value here disagrees with another calculator by a factor of 100, that is the first thing to check. Interpretation bands here are the PALICC-2 (2023) two-tier scheme for invasively ventilated children: the oxygenation criterion is OI ≥ 4 and severe is OI ≥ 16. PALICC 2015 used a three-tier scheme — mild (4 ≤ OI < 8), moderate (8 ≤ OI < 16), severe (OI ≥ 16) — and PALICC-2 collapsed the two lower tiers into mild–moderate while leaving the OI severe cutoff (≥ 16) unchanged, so unlike OSI (whose severe cutoff moved from 12.3 to 12) no OI number changed between editions; this implementation applies the PALICC-2 (2023) edition. The map_awp (5–50 cmH₂O) and pao2 (10–700 mmHg) numeric limits are engineering input-validation bounds, not values from a specific publication [NEEDS SOURCE]. OI classifies a physiologic defect; it is not an individual-patient outcome prediction.
| Result | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| < 4 | OI < 4 — Below the PALICC-2 (2023) invasive-ventilation oxygenation criterion for PARDS (OI ≥ 4). Interpret in the full clinical context. |
| 4 to <16 | OI 4 to < 16 — Corresponds to the mild–moderate category for invasively ventilated children in PALICC-2 (2023) (OI ≥ 4 meets the oxygenation criterion; OI < 16). |
| ≥ 16 | OI ≥ 16 — Corresponds to the severe category for invasively ventilated children in PALICC-2 (2023) (OI ≥ 16). |
References
- Emeriaud G, López-Fernández YM, Iyer NP, et al; Second Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference (PALICC-2) of the PALISI Network. Executive Summary of the Second International Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (PALICC-2). Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2023;24(2):143–168.PMID 36661420DOI 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003147
- Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference Group. Pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: consensus recommendations from the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015;16(5):428–439.PMID 25647235DOI 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000350
- Khemani RG, Smith LS, Zimmerman JJ, Erickson S; Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference Group. Pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: definition, incidence, and epidemiology: proceedings from the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015;16(5 Suppl 1):S23–S40.PMID 26035358DOI 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000432
- Slaughter J, Sites J, Ballard H, Bauer J, Schadler A, Severyn N. Comparison of the oxygenation index and the oxygen saturation index as clinical indicators for neonatal ECMO. Front Pediatr. 2025;13:1586985.PMID 40630719DOI 10.3389/fped.2025.1586985
Reproduction rights
Freely reproducible.OI is an arithmetic formula; the PALICC 2015 / PALICC-2 diagnostic and severity thresholds (4, 8, 16) are facts (numbers, formulas), not copyrightable expression. No verbatim scale-item wording is embedded; surrounding guideline prose is paraphrased (oi-osi.md IP status).
Independent clinical validation: pending
Two independent clinical validators will be named here once review is complete.
- 2026-07-25v1.0.0Initial releaseInitial release: OI split out from the former OI/OSI score, with PALICC-2 (2023) two-tier severity bands.
- 2026-08-03v1.1.0ClarificationSourcing pass, no change to the computed number. The FiO₂ convention is now stated as a requirement rather than an aside — PALICC-2 (2023) prints OI as MAP(cmH₂O) × FiO₂(percent) ÷ PaO₂(mmHg), and the ×100 in this implementation is exactly what converts the fraction to that form — and a worked example now pins the magnitude so a future simplification cannot introduce a silent 100-fold error. The PALICC-2 bands were re-verified and are unchanged (criterion OI ≥ 4, severe OI ≥ 16).